Monthly Archives: July 2012

In which I muse about King George I and his mistresses.

Bonsoir!

I’ve always found it so very peculiar that George I was described by his contemporaries as ”A sullen man with a chilly disposition masking a cold heart” yet he kept two mistresses. Granted,they were both different in personality which may have reflected his changing tastes(does that seem saucy?) but which cold hearted person could maintain what essentially was an affair?

Image

Ehrengard Melusine von der Schulenburg was brought to England alongside George I as she was already his long established mistress from Hanover. That is not the sign of someone who was exceedingly chilly. Then again,perhaps there was more than a degree of truth in that statement. Melusine might have been that one link for him in a new country where the customs,history and language inspired nothing but apathy. Interestingly enough, she was famed for her stoic yet soft manner which goes against all that has been said about the manner of George I.

Image

Sophia von Kielmansegg, Countess of Darlington

Sophia was a shrewish woman. By most accounts, she was also extremely mercenary but added to this a certain amount of charisma. This ensured that when she followed George I to England upon his assumption of the crown, there would be little trouble with making acquaintances with potentially advantageous courtiers who would secure her land,titles and money. Contrary to popular belief, Sophia was actually the morganatic half sister of George I. Caroline of Ansbach declared her to be ”a wicked woman” who would give herself the air of being a mistress and thus acquire money in exchange for promises to persuade the king to grant royal posts. Her charisma worked. Sophia was created Countess of Leinster, Countess of Darlington and Baroness Brentford as a direct result of cultivating a close relationship with George I.

Once again,this is surely proof that while George I may have been sullen,there genuinely could have been a softer side to him which, granted, only ever emerged when he was truly comfortable and had known the people surrounding him for an exceedingly long time. His reign in England lasted only 13 years – nowhere nearly enough to allow him to shed his chilly exterior.

1 Comment

Filed under Musings about Georgians

Chaconne des Scaramouches

A really quite wonderful piece of music by the incomparable Jean-Baptiste Lully. Lully was an exquisite composer,more so when composing music for dances such as the sarabande(I have a penchant for this),ritournelle,chaconne and the gavotte(a saucy,17th century dance which I quite adore). It’s just so quintessentially Baroque in style. There’s a consistently heavy base with a lighter,melodic sound in fleeting succession. It’s just beautiful.

Leave a comment

July 8, 2012 · 11:50 pm

In which I talk about(or rather muse about) bawdy,saucy,17th century poetry.

Bonsoir!

I’ve recently been on quite a 17th century poetry spree. My heart may belong wholly to the 18th century and all the individuals who made a part of it but until quite recently,I read the works of…..oh,how I hate to admit this,Victorian poets. This was remedied by a recent perusal of some famously licentious poems by the ‘Libertine poets’. This band of people who eschewed the moral restrictions society laid down proceeded to inspire artists and those with a penchant for writing by making their own views on morals all too clear. Their actions may seem like nothing unusual to us nowadays but it was all shockingly scandalous back then.

Image

John Wilmot, 2nd Earl of Rochester

In my opinion,the essence of this defiance was captured in the writings of John Wilmot,2nd Earl of Rochester. Here are parts from his poem, ‘Against Constancy’ : ‘Tell me no more of constancy,that frivolous pretense/Strew my bed/I’ll change a mistress till I’m dead’.  This poem’s filled with such disdain for any sort of constancy even to a mistress because even that would command the ILLUSION of minor respectability. To be quite honest,smutty poetry is what it is-smutty. I always like to think that some 17th century poets used it partially as a front for expressing opinions on society and some just because that’s what they felt.  Of course,with libertinism  comes a degree of vanity and I DO NOT say that with any hint of prudishness. That may be left to the latter half of the 19th century. This vanity is what makes us (certainly me) adore these poets,composers,authors,artists and so forth. There are few things as attractive as someone who knows their own self worth!

Leave a comment

Filed under Musings about Poets/Poetry